There is no government activity on the Black Hills. But on November 5, 2009, President Obama told the people of The Native Ages, “You deserve to have a voice” and you won`t forget while I`m in the White House.  This statement was made following The signing by President Obama of a bill authorizing authorities to submit documents regarding methods and efforts that allow Indian tribes to participate and influence American political decisions regarding tribal life. [which one?] We will find additional support for this conclusion. C Change of the 2. This amendment provided that when setting compensation, “expenses relating to food, rations or provisions are not considered payments for the debt.” The report of the Senate Home and Island Affairs Committee, which accompanied this amendment, contains two relevant points. First, it found that “although broadly worded, this change is geared towards a fundamental objective – the acceleration of the Indian Claims Commission`s provision on the famous Black Hills case.” S.Rep.No.93-863, p. 2 (1974) U.S.Code Cong. Admin.News 1974, 6111, 6112 (with Sioux Tribes memorandum). Second, the Committee stated that, of course, the Pope`s Court expressly refused to consider “the application of the principles announced in the Klein case to a case in which Congress attempted to overturn the Court of Claims ruling in favour of the government and to demand a reintroducation of the appeal.” Id., at 8-9, 65 S.C., at 21. The case before us could be considered as this issue.
However, we conclude that the issue of separation of powers presented in this case has already received an answer in Cherokee Nation and that this answer is entirely consistent with Klein`s principles. From unre recorded history to the first recorded history, the Lakota Sioux camped in the winter in the Black Hills, after the migration of bison from Canada to Mexico, and only came across a U.S. government spokesman during the Lewis and Clark Expedition in 1804, near the Missouri River. Both men renounced entry into the Black Hills because they did not have state jurisdiction and feared the deadly consequences of entering the Holy Land.  In addition, the Teton Sioux first embraced Lewis and Clark with gifts and food, and in return, Lewis and Clark informed the Indians that the United States controlled much of the Sioux countries under the newly acquired territory of Louisiana by handing out medals to symbolize american peace and citizenship.  Here, on the other hand, the decision-making question is identical to that decided in 1942. It is clear from a comparison of the 1942 Court of Justice decision and the Court`s opinion today that only an interpretation of the events of 1877 has changed. The Court concluded today that the facts of this case “would not lead to the conclusion that the law had the effect of “simply altering the installation of Indian tribal property.” Ante, 413. But that is exactly what the Court of Claims found in 1942.
See above, 425-426. There has not even been a change in the law, because the Court today relies on decisions made long before the 1942 judgment of the Court of Justice. It is the point of view of history, not the law, that has developed. See below, under 434-437. The decision is therefore clearly nothing more than a second interpretation of the specific substantive issue that was decided in 1942.